I would agree that Capture isn't the most intuitive when you first look at it. I think with the latest versions of Capture it's unfair to say that WYSIWYG is better at renders, Capture has come on in leaps and bounds in that area. It's a bit like buying a Rolex watch for thousands or a much more sensibly priced watch, they both tell the time but you pay the extra to have a Rolex on your arm. WYSIWYG is certainly the industry 'standard' but the greater cost doesn't outweigh the performance difference.essentially you're paying a premium for it being the standard.
We've been using Capture for several years now and are very happy with it. Wyg does seempretty clunky to me and some of the so called advantages like producingpaperwork I often export to excel and do it myself instead if using the builtin features. I should addthat I feel pretty competent at Wig but I’m self-taught so some of my grievanceswith Wig could be my inexperience that I could rectify with some training. I need software that can primarily produce plots and reportsand do the odd rendering.
Also I think the paperwork and reports actually look pretty good.ĭoes anyone have any tips or caveats that I should be awareof if planning on switching to Capture? Is the intuitiveness of Capture at theexpense of power/features? I’ve had a good look atthe Capture demo and I really like the plot style much more than wyg. The general consensus seems to be that Wyg is better atrendering and creating paper work but more expensive. That is until I had a look at Cast’s Capture.
I currently use Wysiwyg report and was going to upgrade todesign to ‘Design’ so I can produce renderings and work in 3d.
0 kommentar(er)
